Language, Gender, and Power in Fraternity Men's Discourse

Kiesling, Scott Fabius (1996) Language, Gender, and Power in Fraternity Men's Discourse. Doctoral Dissertation, Georgetown University.

	PDF Submitted Version Available under License : See the attached license file. Download (12MB)
	Plain Text (licence) Available under License : See the attached license file. Download (1kB)

Abstract

In language and gender research, it has been noted that the fact that men hold power in society should be an important consideration when analyzing the differences between women’s and men’s language. But it has not been shown exactly how the power of men affects their speech. This study examines how members of a community of men use language, and the role of power in that language use. I investigate how the member’s identities as men affect their language use and how they actively employ language to create identities. All the men create powerful identities through language using the same general process; however, the specific linguistic manifestation of power differs from speaker to speaker, situation to situation, and even moment to moment. The general sociolinguistic process the men use to create powerful identities is role indexing: They index community- or culturally-based roles understood to be powerful (i.e., capable of affecting other people’s actions through social alignment) by using linguistic forms and strategies identified with these roles in the community and culture. The community studied is an undergraduate fraternity (and all-male social club) at a university in the United States. The fraternity men construct powerful identities because the ideology of their community organizes the world into competitive hierarchies. Power for the men is therefore a role at the top of a hierarchy. This local ideology reflects the ideology of the larger culture—hegemonic masculinity—which values some kinds of identities more than others. Men’s power is thus a role at the top of a hierarchy; however, men identify with roles in different hierarchies, leading them to construct different kinds of powerful identities. I suggest how power works in the men’s language in discourse, and how the same processes lead to variation patterns in their language-use system. Most importantly, variants have general, abstract meanings when considered globally; it is only when used in concert with other linguistic forms and strategies, and other social signaling systems, that specific meanings become clear.

---

Share

Citation/Export:	Select format... Citation - Text Citation - HTML Endnote BibTex Dublin Core OpenURL MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS EP3 XML Reference Manager Refer
Social Networking:	Share |

---

Details

Item Type:	Other Thesis, Dissertation, or Long Paper (Doctoral Dissertation)
Status:	Unpublished
Creators/Authors:	Creators Email Pitt Username ORCID Kiesling, Scott Fabius kiesling@pitt.edu KIESLING 0000-0003-4954-1038
Contributors:	Contribution Contributors Name Email Pitt Username ORCID Committee Chair Fasold, Ralph UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Committee Member Shuy, Roger UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Committee Member Tannen, Deborah UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED
Date:	1996
Date Type:	Submission
Publisher:	Georgetown University
Institution:	Georgetown University
Schools and Programs:	Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences > Linguistics
Thesis Type:	Doctoral Dissertation
Refereed:	No
Uncontrolled Keywords:	masculinity, masculinities, style
Date Deposited:	17 Jun 2009 17:58
Last Modified:	05 Sep 2024 15:55
URI:	http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2713

---

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

---

Actions (login required)

View Item